Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Anu Märkälä

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Anu Märkälä

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Present: Antti Laitinen, Ari Rouvari, Anu Märkälä (secr.), Antti Kaasila, Egle Gedrimiene, Abhinay Panday, Annica Moore, Topias Kähärä, Tarja Puura, Janniina Määttä


Virtually:

Vera Mol, Monique Leegte, Kiira Noponen, Hanni Muukkonen


Agenda:

  • Antti opened the meeting at 15:02. The purpose of this meeting is to share information among the team members so that everybody is up-to-date and knows what will happen next.
  • Antti also reminded the team to fill in their designated parts in the road map.
  • The team members presented themselves as we went through the sections of the road map.
  • Road map - 15 minutes each theme
      • Framework architecture
        • Deployment
          • Ari explained first what framework architecture is all about and how it differs from technical architecture (in this project: technical requirements).
          • Ari told that they have got very postive feedback in the evaluation interviews. There is clearly strong interest in our work.
          • Vera brought up an idea to organize a workshop with the Dutch Europass consortium. The test version of the new Europass portfolio will be available in June and they would like to to test it on us to see if the two (Compleap and Europass) are interoperable.
      • Analytics
        • Deployment
          • Hanni gave a short up-date on Oulu univeristy´s role in the project. Then Egle, Abi and Antti K. told about their work.
          • Competence visualizations have been left aside because of lack of time and resources. Instead the focus is on competence mapping now. (Egle)
          • Pressing issue in analytics is how two different data sets, ESCO and Koski data, can be mapped. An algorithm is being developed to solve this mathematical problem. (Abi)
          • Antti K. takes care of piloting in OSAO in Oulu.
      • Learner plan prototype including three modules
        • Deployment
          • Marcus told that the prototype is online and we will have a look at it tomorrow. There are three user profiles in the prototype. One profile which is using Koski data, another one which is not using Koski data and a third one which imitates a person who has not graduated yet. 
          • Recommendation system is based on Koski data and it is the main analytics function in the prototype.
          • The second big question in prototype development is how interests can be added to the profile. WP3 is working hard on this and a solution will be found soon. Interests will be in  the first beta prototype in one way or another.
          • In terms of deployment in Netherlands, proof of concept will be possible to arrange. This means that we will test whether it is possible to transfer test data from DUO´s registry into Compleap.
          • Antti reminded that deployment plans need to be agreed upon till mid May when the steering committee have their next meeting.
          • Abi requested information on the level of documentation of degree parts in the Dutch system. Vera promised to figure it out this week. She will get back to Abi/ EDUFI.
      • Europass case study
        • Europass conference in Budapest takes place 5.-6.6.
      • Engaging project communications and coming events
        • Discussion on EAIE event in Helsinki has to be discussed again and see if the budget allows it. 
      • Project management
        • Janniina and Anu will go through the dissemination events and budget tomorrow.
        • Topias from EDUFI presented pictures on roles and responsibilities in piloting.
  • Discussion who should participate the workshop in Cologne 14.5.
    •  Ari, Antti/CSC
    • who from EDUFI?
  • Reporting (deliverables + additional documents) - 30 minutes
    • For steering committee approval by May x.x.
      • Additional documents 
      • D26 Three prototypes 
    • By the end of May
      • D20 Running prototypes in cooperation with WP3
      • D21 Feedback and specifications to user scenarios
      • D24 Open source code for all components, including example code
      • D25 Technical documentation including glossary, model and architecture
    • Living documents (to be updated in wiki) 
      • D9 Project management and steering group meetings
      • D27 Pilot deployment of the architecture
      • D28 Pilot deployment of the analytics prototype
      • D29 Pilot deployment of learner plan prototype
      • D38 Presentations and publications
      • D39 Targeted workshops and seminars in cooperation with WP2
  • Meeting was closed17:00