Page History

...

Apologies: Tarja Puura

Time: 14:00-14:44

DRAFT

Agenda:

1. Feedback on the workshop in Kittilä 9.-11.4.
   1. The team thanked
   Big thanks to
   1. Tarja for organizing and facilitating the workshop
   last week
   1. .  Janniina will deliver the greetings to her  
   2. The project team perceived the workshop
   was useful; clearer overall picture, reassurance & next steps for piloting for associated partners, team building & face-to-face meeting.
   1. very useful as it was good chance to meet face-to-face with everybody. It also made the overall picture and the next steps of piloting a lot clearer for the project team and the associated partners. Overall, it was good team building day. The project team and the associated partners got to know each other.
2. Road map (Antti Laitinen to check that everybody has editing rights to the PMC tables.)
   
   1. Framework architecture:
      1. Discussion on how to realize deployment in the Netherlands. It was suggested to co-operate with the Dutch Europass and invite them to
   Road map table
   1. Framework architecture deployment in NL: possible co-operation with the Dutch Europass consortium in the Fall. Suggestion for them to join
      1. the workshop in Cologne 14.5.
      - not possible for DUO. DUO sends the invitation to the even though it is unlikely.
   2. Analytics: Abhi is working on ESCO. Recommendation system (Reaktor´s responsibility) - how it is going and what is Egle et all role? AP Egle/Annica: to be updated in the first column "Main columns and results".  Deploymen plan ready by end of May (Fi + other countries)
   3. 1. 2019 since co-operation with SBB seems very unlikely. Vera Mol Monique Leegte will send the invitation to the Dutch Europass group (+ Antti in cc) and see how they respond. DUO itself is not able to travel to Cologne then.
      2.  Deployment plan including Finland and other countries should be ready by the end of May.
   4. Analytics:
      1. Abhi´s work is progressing well. It was difficult to create interests based on ESCO but there is a new solution for that now. See the new ontology: http://finto.fi/fi/about This will be presented in more detail in the next demo on Wed.
      2. Information regarding the competence mapping and recommendation system should be updated in the road map in the first column "main goals and project results" Egle Gedrimiene Annica Moore
   5. Prototypes:
      1. The time line for reporting is very tight. What kind of feedback we wish to get from the steering committee is worth thinking of
      Prototypes: reporting / in general very strict time line for the additional documents on the beta prototype. To think what kind of feedback we want from the steering committee
      1. .
      2. Next demo on Wednesday 17.4. Vera
      involved
      1. participates as a commentator
   6. It was difficult to get intrests from ESCO > a new solution; new ontology (suom. asiasana- ja ontologiapalvelu tms.) http://finto.fi/fi/about - will be addressed in the demo
   7. 1. .
3. Other
   1. Eva NefflingEva / EDUFI was welcomed to the team - . She can help with the Europass case study once she has familiarized herself with the project. Also Anu from CSC can participate if needed.
   2. Annica cleared up that the Europass case study (based on the workshop in Budapest in June) should be framed = case study is workshop and it will be organized in Budapest, says Vera. Prototype must be ready in June, otherwise they are not interested... // Annica: more like an information package on inter linkages & and possibilities between Europass and Compleap.  Compleap and Europass than an extensive research. DL for the case study ?Monique + Erik from DUO,  Eva from EDUFI + other people travelling to Budapest? Antti sends save the date to the team.has to be agreed upon. (sooner the better)