...
More detailed plans on the piloting of these prototypes can be found on the subpages of this page.
Timetable
| Event | Date |
|---|---|
Associated Partner Kick-off @GRADIA | 18 September 2018 |
| Reference Group Workshop @EDUFI | 10 October 2018 |
| Associated Partner Workshop @OSAO | 31 October 2018 |
| Stakeholder Mid-term Seminar @EDUFI | 4 December 2018 |
| Associated Partner Workshop @TREDU | 17 January 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop @EDUFI | 14 March 2019 |
| Network Workshop @GRADIA | March 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop @REDU | 10 - 11 April 2019 |
| Piloting the architecture | April 2019 |
| Training sessions | May 2019 |
| Network Workshop in Helsinki | May 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop in Germany | May 2019 |
| Training sessions in Finland | May 2019 - |
| Piloting Phase 1 | June – August 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop in the Netherlands | June 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop 1 in other countries | June 2019 |
| Evaluation sessions | August 2019 |
| Training session | August 2019 |
| Piloting Phase 2 | September – October 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop in Germany | September 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop 2 in other countries | September 2019 |
| Associated Partner Workshop in the Netherlands | September 2019 |
| Evaluation sessions | October 2019 |
| Dissemination seminar in Finland | November 2019 |
| Dissemination seminar in Europe | November 2019 |
| Impact Evaluation Study (ready) | November 2019 |
Deliverables:
Deployment (WP4) will be reported in the deliverables:
...
There are 27,75 personal months in total to be used for personnel expenses in the work package 4. These PMs are shared with five partner organizations in the following way:
Partner | pm |
Gradia (wp-leader) | 6 |
12 | |
CSC | 3 |
Oulu University | 5 |
DUO | 1,75 |
Total | 27,75 |
Costs | Description | € | Total |
Partner costs |
40 000 | |||
| Associated partners in Finland, cooperation in piloting | 30 000 | |
|
Associated partners in other countries, cooperation in piloting | 10 000 |
Workshop costs |
40 000 | ||
| Workshops in Finland (4 + 3) | 10 000 |
| Workshops in the Netherlands (2) | 4 000 | |
|
Workshops in other countries (3) | 6 000 |
| Training, orientation, evaluation | 6 000 |
| Conferencies, entry fees etc. in Finland | 5 000 | |
|
Conferencies, entry fees etc. in other countries | 5 000 |
| Dissemination seminars | 4 000 |
Travel costs |
25 000 | |||
| External experts in Finland | 15 000 | |
|
External experts in other countries | 10 000 |
Material costs |
20 000 | |||
| Marketing material | 2 500 |
| Videos | 10 000 | |
|
Publications/printing | 3 000 |
| Translation services | 1 500 | |
|
Seminars, conferences and other events | 3 000 |
Total |
| 125 000 | ||
|
|
|
Table 7
Risks: assessment and anticipation
...
The following risks will be included in the Risk Management Plan for the whole project.
The most significant risks involve setting piloting objectives, carrying out the piloting as well as the steady management of piloting (the latter two are heavily intertwined).
The risk | Description | Impacts | Assessment and anticipation |
Timeline | Development of the prototype(s) will be delayed. | It is not possible to start piloting the deployment of the architecture/analytics prototype/learner plan prototype M17, because they are not ready. Impacts also reporting (M20 – M22), evaluation (M20 – M23) and dissemination (M20). | Realistic timeline and enough resources for the development phase. Commitment and use of Reference Group members and other partners to get results in time. |
Open alignments | It is not possible to start piloting the deployment because of open alignments. The consortium is not sure what we are supposed to do/develop in the project. Too many open questions, no management. | Not following the Annex I and not achieving what was promised. Goals change on the way. | Good project management, planning, open discussion and cooperation with WP2 and WP3. No unclear questions, planning tools ready to deploy. |
The core objectives of the work package/project are not achieved.
| It is not possible to deploy the architecture/analytics prototype/learner plan prototype because of the lack of functionalities. There is a disagreement or a misunderstanding how to achieve the objectives. | Deployment is not possible at all, only piloting. | Active cooperation and enough resources in the development phase. The objectives are defined carefully. |
The resources in piloting the deployment | There is not enough resources to use for the work package like promised. |
The implementation and deployment will be delayed. There will be lack of time and poor results in piloting. | Good project management especially with the resources. Commitment of the partner organizations. |
...
The roles and responsibilities in organizing the work in WP4[
...
- Pilot preparations and involvement in protype development processes.
The role and the responsibilities of EDUFI in WP4:
...
- Final seminar in cooperation with Gradia, CSC and DUO (M20).
The role and the responsibilities of University of Oulu in WP4:
- Define the analytic parts to pilot.
- Pilot the visualisations.recommendation system and mapping of competences
- Pilot the Beta version in Finland (compare educational opportunities, with functionalities).
- Produce material needed for reporting.-
The role and the responsibilities of CSC in WP4:
...
- Help and support the WP-leader to achieve the objectives.
The role and the responsibilities of DUO in WP4:
...