When assessing publication channels, you should keep in mind that there are plenty of evaluation tools available and not all of them are reliable. In most cases, this untrustworthiness is related to the so-called predatory publishers or journals, which aim to enhance their quality in dishonest ways by using the indicators offered by fake analysis tools. Most commonly, these tools offer indicators that resemble the Journal Impact Factor indicator produced by Clarivate Analytics and that may even have exactly the same name. The reason for this is a high appreciation of this indicator as a measure of the quality of the publication channel, which means that journals consider it worthwhile using even questionable methods to achieve it.