Present: Allan Souza, Anne-Marie Tuikka, Elina Mäntylä, Johanna Laiho-Kauranne, Riitta Koikkalainen, Liisa Mannermaa-Mankinen, Niina Nurmi, Tuomas Alaterä, Jessica Parland-von Essen, chairperson, Marita Kari
Apologies: Ulriika Vihervalli (secretary)
Notes:
- Jessica Parland-von Essen was chosen as the chairperson of the working group.
- Introduction: setting the scene (Jessica, ppt)
Jessica introduced the work group and its target, the outline of the introduction is available in the above linked powerpoint presentation.- Discussion on the time frame of the working group and arranging the implementation of the EOSC Node. DaHa Architecture is closely linked to the EOSC workgroup work.
- Targets suggested: short-term actions to be taken & longer term needs for this group. YTF is monitoring the use of national service catalogs as one priority area. However YTF does not do practical work, so this working group is needed to promote the work.
- National service catalogue is of paramount importance, the creation of the national EOSC node service catalogue
- Introducing the federating capabilities > CSC already provides these services
- It was presented how the Finnish EOSC node alignes with the RDA GORC ( Global Open Research commons International Model) model
- Discussion pointed that there are plenty of central services, but there should be clarity on the detailed services, are they only regarded as services in the service and data catalogues. For example, looking to the services of Data archive could we federate them in more user accessible format. We should focus on the national level.
- Import to provide case studies from the RPOs to the EOSC node.
- In Finland, the user researcher should not know/worry about whether he/she is using his/her own organisation's services or the services from the EOSC node
- Connection to the EU Node: the federation does not work yet, most organisations do not have machine actionable service catalogues
- Choosing goals and tasks
- Menti.com code 6208 8713
- Menti opened for and filled in by the meeting attendees
- Menti results will be shared with an analysis of their takeup in the group agenda
- Results (file)
Most urgent:
RoP
Interoperability
Most relevant for WG:
Engagement
Human Capacity
RoP
Governance
Services
Interoperability
- Agreeing on ways of working
- Weekly or biweekly meetings (on Fridays) to begin with
- Working language is chosen based on the needs of the attendees, English or Finnish
- Use of a chat tool was also discussed, Jessica and Ulriika will discuss this further