...
- Quantitative indicators can be used to support qualitative peer review of scientific activity. Peer review should be the primary approach for evaluating individual researchers.
- Publication metrics should be based on data that is relevant for the unit of assessment. The known limitations of the data should always be disclosed.
- Being as open and transparent as possible in data collection, analytical processes and results is necessary. Those being evaluated should, as far as possible, be able to check both the data used and the results of the analysis.
- Disciplinary differences and interdisciplinarity should be taken into account in the application of publication metrics.
- The indicators used in assessment should be chosen to support the aims of the evaluation.
- Results should be reported with an accuracy relevant for the unit of assessment, methods and the data. Inapplicable indicators should not be reported.
- Specific expertise is needed in the production and interpretation of publication metrics.
- Organisations committed to this recommendation should provide sufficient resources and expertise needed for producing and interpreting publication metrics. Organisations should offer training for responsible use of publication metrics for their faculty and staff.
- Organisations committed to this recommendation should name the responsible party in their organisation who can be contacted in cases of irresponsible use of publication metrics.
National The national recommendation on the for responsible use of publication metrics (only in Finnish) (pdf)
This recommendation in English is included in the Good practice in researcher evaluation. Recommendation for the responsible evaluation of a researcher in Finland.
Responsible use of the Publication Forum classification
...