...
- Europass Case Study - background
- Has come from the commission without a proper guidance - the main point: what's useful for all parties?
- The approach and the budgets are different in CompLeap and Europass but for example the goals are similar.
- A lot of architecture work has been done in CompLeap which could be useful for the chaotic development phase of Europass.
- An algorithm is something that can "live" after the CompLeap project is over but we should also keep in mind the future after the project is over from other perspectives too.
- How does the guidance is shown in Case Study?
- What does the guidance mean in this case? Mika:- is the service user-friendly - does it support lifelong learning - learning, career development, jobhunt
- Europass: A user study in September - individual end-user can use the prototype
- Is the Europass proto available? - At first it will be availbe in a closed group.
- In the long run Europass has a will to build similar features than in CompLeap's interests - Mika has made a research about this for William - some kind of version released in the spring 2020
- What kind of data the suggestion system is using in Europass?
- user profile
- Ploteus (learning opportunities and qualifications) - Europass Advisory group: the criteria of how education programmes and education opportunities can be searched is still "in the air"; the priority is in the higher education - How the information is got from the memeber member countries is a big question?
- CompLeap has couple of potential international deployment partners that could offer an example what kind of national data is available
- Funding has been given previously to member countries concerning Ploteus - which wasn't really thought through - it is not a sustainable solution for transferring education information
- EURES collaboration (job opportunities)
...