...
Clarivate has productised the WoS data also for several separate — and separately paid for — machine-readable interfaces. The WoS access subscribed to by several Finnish organisations through the FinElib consortium only includes the most basic WoS API Lite and Links AMR interfaces. WoS API Expanded, which includes more extensive metadata on the publications, as well as citation numbers, for example, and the WoS Journals API, which include Journal Impact Factor metrics, both require additional subscriptions.
...
Sources
Clarivate Analytics. (2021) WoS_Collection_Diagram_002_CMYK_V5 [figure]. Available: https://clarivate.libguides.com/webofscienceplatform/coverage [Accessed 24.11.2021]
...
Clarivate Analytics. (2022) Näkymä WoS viittausraportista [screenshot]. Available: https://www.webofscience.com/wos/ [Accessed 4.2.2022]
Martín-MartínLeino, Y. (2020) Web of Science julkaisujen osuus VIRTA-julkaisuista päätieteenaloittain vuosina 2012-2017 [figure]. Esityksessä Julkaisutietokantojen kattavuus: VIRTA vs. Web of Science, Bibliometriikkaseminaari 2020. Available: https://wiki.eduuni.fi/display/CSCbibliometriikka/Bibliometriikkaseminaari+2020 [Accessed 4.2.2022]
Martín-Martín, A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E. and López-Cózar, E.D. (2021) Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126, pp. 871–906 A., Thelwall, M., Orduna-Malea, E. and López-Cózar, E.D. (2021) Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations. Scientometrics, 126, pp. 871–906. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4Mongeon, P. and Paul-Hus, A. (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, pp. 213–228. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015020-176503690-54
Singh, V.K., Singh, Mongeon, P. , Karmakar, M. et al. (2021and Paul-Hus, A. (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science , and Scopus and Dimensions: A a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126106, pp. 5113–5142213–228. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021015-039481765-5
VisserSingh, MV.K., van EckSingh, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2021) Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, P., Karmakar, M. et al. (2021) The journal coverage of Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1)Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, pp. 20–415113–5142. Available: https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_001121007/s11192-021-03948-5
Visser, M., van Eck, N.J. and Waltman, L. (2021) Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), pp. 20–41. Leino, Y. (2020) Web of Science julkaisujen osuus VIRTA-julkaisuista päätieteenaloittain vuosina 2012-2017 [figure]. Esityksessä Julkaisutietokantojen kattavuus: VIRTA vs. Web of Science, Bibliometriikkaseminaari 2020. Available: https://wikidoi.eduuniorg/10.fi/display/CSCbibliometriikka/Bibliometriikkaseminaari+2020 [Accessed 4.2.2022]1162/qss_a_00112