Present: Antti Laitinen, Anu Märkälä (secr.) Egle Gedrimiene, Vera Mol, Monique Leegte, Annica Moore, Tarja Puura, Hanni Muukkonen
Meeting notes:
DRAFT - to be refined 12.2.Round of WP´s: WPs - "How have you started to answering answer the feedback from the mid-term review?"
- WP 2+3: efficiency, knowledge into user-friendly format, clearer description, not much time to create something new, there is
- Annica highlighted that there are already a lot of information
- Egle: writing summary on desk research etc. How about workshops?
- WP 4: Time and date: steering committee - project team collaboration >> joint meeting CSC-Oulu-Edufi meeting coming soon
- in eduuni wiki but is scattered. Instead of creating something new, we should put the existing information into a user-friendly format. This would be very efficient as the time is scarce.
- WP 4:
- Egle is writing summaries on desk research, learning analytics etc. in order to improve the documentation.
- A developer will probably join the Compleap team at Oulu University. How to organize multisite developing between Oulu and Edufi? To be discussed among them.
- It was noted that there should be arguments in the road map for the new developer in Oulu.
- Discussion arose on the collaboration between the steering committee and the project team. The team feels that they really need support at this stage of the project.
- The time and date of a joint meeting (CSC-Edufi-Oulu) to be decided today.
- WP 5:
WP 5: Some changes in wiki.- Some changes have been made in wiki.
- Monique to rewrite the stakeholder plan.
- SBB has been contacted.
- DUO and Edufi will discuss the Dutch diploma register together from developer´s
- point of view.
From now on let´s make sure to document everything and make it "presentable".
PART 2 - Road map and holistic plan for the rest of the project (14:30-15:50)
- Antti has sent the project officer´s comments and information on the action points to the project team.
- Antti showed the steering committee decision log to others.
- e.g. 26.2. webinar > measurable Measurable feedback from the stakeholder
- stakeholders should be collected in the next webinar on February 26th.
- Project road map:
- Antti showed presented the road map draft and template in the wiki (from the steering committee, which was prepared by the steering committee. He noted that this template is not bound to individual WPs but the concrete actions). Antti prefers this to his previous as is the previous, deliverable-based suggestion. Comments?
- Annica: What kind of information is needed? Links to documents, dates, plan? Concrete instructions needed to make a coherence plan. Antti: The aim is to give a general view. Links are ok. What suits the WP best.
- Vera: not fond of steering committees template, prefers Antti´s previous template.
- Annica: suggestion to put the all deliverables list into a chronological list. Plans for the future through links.
Decision along the question what will help us? >> let´s skip steering committees template>> all delivarables list with more information.- >> We use steering committee´s template + mark where the biggest needs are so that steering committee can see them. Each WP leader to fill in on their part in the road map. + The holistic plan in a separate file what kind of budget transfers are need etc.
- What information needs to be in the road map? Level of detail? Plan for subcontractors could work as a basis for filling up the road map. However, there are many unknowns in the development work.
- What information needs to be in the road map? Level of detail? Plan for subcontractors could work as a basis for filling up the road map. However, there are many unknowns in the development work.
- draft that he had made earlier. Therefore, steering committee´s suggestion would suit the holistic plan very well.
- Discussion followed on the two options on the table for the road map.
- Not all were fond of the steering committee´s template. It was also suggested to put the "all deliverables" list into a chronological order and add plans for the future to it through links.
- Antti highlighted that the decision should be based on our own judgement - we should select the format that helps us most.
- In the end, it was agreed that we use the steering committee´s template and each WP leader fills in their part this week.
- Internal WP leaders meeting
- on Friday 15.2. at 12-13 at Edufi offices
Next week:- to support the preparation of the road map.
- Antti highlighted that WP leaders should mark in the road map where the biggest needs are so that the steering committee can see them.
- The holistic plan is a separate document. It should address the budgetary issues especially.
- to support the preparation of the road map.
- Joint meeting Edufi-Oulu-CSC meeting for making the holistic plan, especially in terms if budget.
on Monday 18th of February at 9am (PLACE?)
Mon 18.2 9am (- Pekka from Edufi
- and Stina from CSC
- will participate in the meeting as well.
- Definitions definitions of the goals of the project:
- A) 3 three prototypes: framework, analytics, learner plan (includes modules)
- i) framework
- ii) learning analytics
- iii) learner plan which includes modules
- B) 3 three prototypes in the learner plan (OBS! Learning analytics is a functionality within the learner plan i.)
- i) competence profile
- ii) diploma data coming into the profile
- iii) suggestions for education opportunities
- Analytics is a functionality within the learner plan
- A) 3 three prototypes: framework, analytics, learner plan (includes modules)
...
- Other issues:
- Tarja informed the group that Salpaus will have a new student management system which
...
- is why they are very busy
...
- at the moment. Tarja suggested that we could replace Salpaus with Specia (special needs). Interested becoming associated partners- Antti to deliver the contacts to Tarja.