You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Current »

Present: Antti Laitinen, Anu Märkälä (secr.) Egle Gedrimiene, Vera Mol, Monique Leegte, Annica Moore, Tarja Puura, Hanni Muukkonen

Meeting notes:

Round of WPs - "How have you  started to answer the feedback from the mid-term review?"

  • WP 2+3:
    • Annica highlighted that there are already a lot of information in eduuni wiki but is scattered. Instead of creating something new, we should put the existing information into a user-friendly format. This would be very efficient as the time is scarce.
  • WP 4:
    • Egle is writing summaries on desk research, learning analytics etc. in order to improve the documentation.
    • A developer will probably join the Compleap team at Oulu University. How to organize multisite developing between Oulu and Edufi? To be discussed among them.
    • It was noted that there should be arguments in the road map for the new developer in Oulu. 
    • Discussion arose on the collaboration between the steering committee and the project team. The team feels that they really need support at this stage of the project.
    • The time and date of a joint meeting (CSC-Edufi-Oulu) to be decided today.
  • WP 5:
    • Some changes have been made in wiki.
    • Monique to rewrite the stakeholder plan.
    • SBB has been contacted. 
    • DUO and Edufi will discuss the Dutch diploma register together from developer´s point of view.

PART 2 - Road map and holistic plan for the rest of the project (14:30-15:50)

  • Antti has sent the project officer´s comments and information on the action points to the project team.
  • Antti showed the steering committee decision log to others.
    • e.g. Measurable feedback from stakeholders should be collected in the next webinar on February 26th.
  • Project road map:
    • Antti presented the road map draft which was prepared by the steering committee. He noted that this template is not bound to individual WPs as is the previous, deliverable-based draft that he had made earlier. Therefore, steering committee´s suggestion would suit the holistic plan very well.
    • Discussion followed on the two options on the table for the road map.
      • Not all were fond of the steering committee´s template. It was also suggested to put the "all deliverables" list into a chronological order and add plans for the future to it through links.
      • Antti highlighted that the decision should be based on our own judgement - we should select the format that helps us most.
      • In the end, it was agreed that we use the steering committee´s template and each WP leader fills in their part this week.
        • Internal WP leaders meeting on Friday 15.2. at 12-13 at Edufi offices to support the preparation of the road map.
        • Antti highlighted that WP leaders should mark in the road map where the biggest needs are so that the steering committee can see them.
        • The holistic plan is a separate document. It should address the budgetary issues especially.
      • Joint meeting Edufi-Oulu-CSC on Monday 18th of February at 9am (PLACE?)
        • Pekka from Edufi and Stina from CSC will participate in the meeting as well. 
  • Definitions of the goals of the project:
    • A) three prototypes:
      • i) framework
      • ii) learning analytics
      • iii) learner plan which includes modules
    • B) three prototypes in the learner plan (OBS! Learning analytics is a functionality within the learner plan.)
      •  i) competence profile
      • ii) diploma data coming into the profile
      • iii) suggestions for education opportunities

  • Other issues:
    • Tarja informed the group that Salpaus will have a new student management system which is why they are very busy at the moment. Tarja suggested that we could replace Salpaus with Specia (special needs).  Interested becoming associated partners- Antti to deliver the contacts to Tarja.






  • No labels