Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Lähteiden ulkoasun yhdenmukaistaminen

...

Lähteet

Abramo, G., Cicero, T. & and D’Angelo, C.A. (2011) . Assessing the varying level of impact measurement accuracy as a function of the citation window length. Journal of Informetrics, 5(4), pp. 659667.  Saatavilla: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.06.004

Adams, J., Pendlebury, D., Potter, R. & and Szomszor, M. (2019) .  Global Global Research Report – Multi-authorship and research analytics. Institute for Scientific Information, Clarivate, London and Philadelphia.

Albarran, P. & and Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011) . References made and citations received by scientific articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), pp. 4049. Saatavilla: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21448

Bornmann, L., Bowman, B.F., Bauer, J., Marx, W., Schier, H. & and Palzenberger, M. (2014) . Bibliometric standards for evaluating research institutes in the natural sciences. In B. Cronin & C. Sugimoto (Eds.), Beyond bibliometrics: harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, pp. 201223.

Garfield, E. (1979) . Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), pp. 359375. 

Moed, H.F., Burger, W.J.M., Frankfort, J.G. & and van Raan, A.F.J. (1985) . The application of bibliometric indicators: important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics, 8(3-4), pp. 177203.