Vastuullisen julkaisumetriikan käytön näkökulmasta yksi keskeisimmistä vaiheista on valita käytettävä aineisto sellaisista lähteistä, joista on saatavilla analysoinnin kohteen ja tavoitteen kannalta relevanttia julkaisudataa. Käyttöön on usein myös tarjolla aivan eri työkaluja silloin, kuin analysoinnin kohteena ovat julkaisukanavat verrattuna esimerkiksi yliopistoihin tai yksittäisiin tutkijoihin. Tässä oppaassa pyritään kattamaan julkaisumetriikan käytön kannalta keskeisimmät näkökulmat ja tuomaan esille keskeisimmät työkalut eri tilanteissa käytettäväksi. On myös syytä huomioida, että osa esiteltävistä lähteistä ja työkaluista ovat maksullisia, mutta useimmiten tarjolla on myös ilmaisia vaihtoehtoja.
Luvun sisältö
Harkittavaksi, tässä alla tarjolle taulukko ja kuvia julkaisemattomasta Janne Seppäsen tekemästä tietokantojen kattavuusvertailusta Jyväskylän yliopiston tutkimusjulkaisuille 2007-2019. Tai ehkä sopii paremmin liitteeksi, tai ehkä ei sovi ollenkaan, tekijä ei pahastu. Näitä saa käyttää ja muokata vapaasti, CC-BY.
Table 1. Output sets in JYU CRIS and discovered match counts in Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P)
JYU CRIS | has DOI | no DOI | |||||||
Peer-reviewed scientific articles (A1-A2) | 16216 | 13213 (81%) | 3003 (18%) | ||||||
D: >99% (13148) | S: 94% (12422) | W: 89% (11739) | P: 36% (4754) | D: 2% (67) | S: 8% (234) | W: 6% (167) | P: NA | ||
Peer-reviewed chapter in book (A3) | 4743 | 1028 (22%) | 3715 (78%) | ||||||
D: 89% (914) | S: 42% (431) | W: 1% (9) | P: <1% (5) | D: 0 | S: 2% (72) | W: 0 | P: NA | ||
Peer-reviewed conference papers (A4) | 3025 | 1421 (47%) | 1604 (53%) | ||||||
D: 99% (1403) | S: 88% (1253) | W: 3% (36) | P: <1% (7) | D: 1% (12) | S: 21% (335) | W: <1% (2) | P: NA | ||
Non-refereed scientific articles (B) | 5898 | 630 (11%) | 5234 (89%) | ||||||
D: 96% (604) | S: 51% (323) | W: 40% (254) | P: 15% (96) | D: <1% (4) | S: 1% (66) | W: <1% (5) | P: NA | ||
Scientific books (C) | 1391 | 150 (11%) | 1241 (89%) | ||||||
D: 88% (132) | S: 31% (46) | W: 12% (18) | P: 0 | D: 0 | S: 1% (10) | W: 1% (7) | P: NA | ||
Professional publications (D) | 5358 | 54 (1%) | 5304 (99%) | ||||||
D: 87% (47) | S: 35% (19) | W: 4% (2) | P: 0 | D: <1% (10) | S: <1% (9) | W: 0 | P: NA | ||
Popularized publications (E) | 3245 | 4 (<1%) | 3235 (>99%) | ||||||
D: 2 | S: 3 | W: 0 | P: 1 | D: 0 | S: 2 | W: 0 | P: NA | ||
Artistic publications (F) | 39 | 0 | 39 (100%) | ||||||
NA | NA | NA | NA | D: 0 | S: 0 | W: 0 | P: NA | ||
Theses (G) | 1798 | 7 (<1%) | 1791 (>99%) | ||||||
D: 6 | S: 0 | W: 1 | P: 0 | D: 0 | S: 2 | W: 4 | P: NA | ||
TOTAL | 41713 | 16507 (40%) | 25206 (60%) | ||||||
D: 98% (16256) | S: 88% (14497) | W: 73% (12059) | P: 29% (4861) | D: <1% (93) | S: 3% (730) | W: 1% (185) | P: NA | ||
Figure 1a. All peer reviewed outputs: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 23984 outputs.
Figure 1b. All peer reviewed outputs with DOI: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 15662 outputs.
Note that in this set Dimensions almost entirely overlaps with all others, and consequently the diagram algorithm fails to fit accurately. Notably, 133 outputs that can be found in Scopus but not in Dimensions fail to appear in this diagram. This Euler diagram is nonetheless included for completeness and comparison, as it is otherwise accurate. Inclusive output incidence is shown in Fig 1c.
Figure 1c. All peer reviewed outputs with DOI: Venn diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 15662 outputs.
Figure 2. Natural Sciences: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 8735 outputs.
Figure 3. Engineering and Technology: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 706 outputs.
Figure 3. Medical and Health Sciences: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 2646 outputs.
Figure 4. Agricultural Sciences: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 81 outputs.
Figure 5. Social Sciences: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 6159 outputs.
Figure 6. Humanities: Area-proportional Euler diagram of peer-reviewed output incidence in JYU CRIS (total), Dimensions (D), Scopus (S), Web of Science (W) and PubMed (P). The total ellipse encompasses 3970 outputs.