Deliverable 8 (living document in connection to Modified project plan). This road map document is a master page of the Compleap project and all relevant pages with further details and steps are linked here so that the page creates a holistic view of the project as a whole.
Status indicators:
Green = Progressing as planned in the modified project plan and roadmap.
Yellow = Delays or deviations. Guidance needed.
Red = Major challenges. Replanning needed.
FYI! Action points for the whole project team based on the remote review in June 2019.
| Main goals and project results | Definition of concepts | Responsible / Work package | Identified risks (constantly monitored) | Key Performance Indicators (KPI) - measurements | Current status - done so far Monthly status | Foresight - to be done during the next month | Deployment | Communication and dissemination of activities | Deliverables across timeline | Evaluation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Framework architecture |
From Annex I
WP2
In this work package, the ecosystem architecture is devised and it is used as a reference throughout the project
..
This WP is to define the framework for the project including the definition of the user scenarios, main architecture aspects and system requirements that will be exploited by the other WPs. The goal is to look into various processes within ecosystem, describe in detail every user scenario and finally design the prototype versions.
WP3
The lead of the work package, Finnish National Agency for Education, produces a testable prototypes that consists of an interface, content and associated services. The results of these tests are used to refine the prototype leading to a blueprint for the actual deployment in the WP4. The iterative development process runs within partner organisation in the Netherlands and results in a final product that is the project will aim to implement at least in Finland in the Netherlands. The testing will aim to involve different user groups from young adults to immigrants and refugees. In addition, number of interested reference group members have expressed their interest to participate in the development and testing.
WP4
This work package will deploy and evaluate the concept and prototypes that have been previously developed in the WP2, WP3 and WP4. The aim is that the partners that have been involved in the task forces will deploy the developed prototypes in their surroundings and use them to support the various user groups, including immigrants and their integration to society through more informed skills formation structures. Besides prototypes deployment in different countries and partners, Finland aims to deploy all developed prototypes, the ecosystem concept, to measure the effectiveness, usability, and/or feasibility of the technology and concept.
Main architecture aspects and system requirements |
Framework architecture
WP2
Ecosystem and modules user scenarios | T1.1 Framework architecture design T1.2: Personal learner plan and user scenarios | WP2
|
|
|
Deployment |
WP4 |
Analytics prototype
- competence visualizations
- education recommendations
WP2 TF-LEA
- UOulu: Hanni, Egle
- EDUFI
Learner plan prototype
competence profile
diploma data coming in to profile
suggestions - education opportunities
WP3
- EDUFI: Annica, Marcus, Outi
- Reaktor
Deliverable 26 Three prototypes
Deliverable 29 Pilot deployment of learner plan prototype
| International deployment: "To tailor the functionality of this framework so that it´s suitable across Europe" (Annex I p.3)
Is "improved recognition practices" included? (Annex I p.3) "particularly addressing the needs of the citizen at risk of exclusion" - is this clear enough? (Annex I p.4) | Deployment progress monitoring
| Deliverable reports D30, D27, D21, D18 ready and sent Evaluation workshops held
Architecture design updated
| Final reporting (periodic report 12/2018-11/2019 + final report 12/2017-11/2019) . | M17-M22 April-September CompLeap Framework Architecture Deployment Plan Provide more details on project progress by monitoring and reporting KPIs e.g.
| D18 Detailed description of the user scenarios with guidelines and advice for developers in WP3 D21 Feedback and specifications to user scenarios D25 Technical documentation, including glossary, model and architecture D27 Pilot deployment of the architecture | Impact evaluation study | ||||
| 2 | Analytics prototype WP2: T1.3 Learning environments and analytics WP3:
| Competence visualisation based on desk research (literature) and reference group generated ideas in workshops Definition of data sources and Integration of in and outputs to the competence mapping Educations recommendation desk research (literature) | WP2 TF-LEA
Deployment WP4
|
Multi-sight development work can be challenging, and can slow down velocity. This needs to be mitigated through active communications and co-working in joint location when ever possible. | Development progress monitoring
Deployment progress monitoring
| Deliverable reports D31, D28 ready and sent Analytics development - see in detailed PMC May 6th During summer achieved to map ESCO competencies to Finnish degrees.
| Final reporting (periodic report 12/2018-11/2019 + final report 12/2017-11/2019) | National deployment (Finland - all prototypes) Detailed plan of the piloting and deployment of the analytics prototype Provide more details on project progress by monitoring and reporting KPIs e.g.
| D28 Pilot deployment of analytics prototype | ||
| 3 | Learner plan prototype incl 3 modules
| Three prototypes defined as:
| WP3
Deployment WP4
| Stakeholder feedback from the demo sessions ○ Increasing the number of backlog items at this point is likely not beneficial.
Strict timetable hinders ability to take on user feedback in development work. This needs to be documented well for future work. Many stakeholders with sometimes contradictory demands. | Development progress
Deployment progress
| Deliverable reports D32, D29 ready and sent Prototype development
Implemented by the 30th of May 2019 Competence Profile
Recommended educational offer Recommendation system ready and in testing Demo sessions held. Stakeholder feedback - see events The user piloting of the prototypes from May. Adding final tweaks to user selection of ESCO competencies and formulation of guidance texts Improvements to usability and tweaks based on feedback received in piloting are implemented by the 30th of August. Second wave of piloting deployment started in Finland 19.8.2019 | Final reporting (periodic report 12/2018-11/2019 + final report 12/2017-11/2019) | National deployment (Finland - all prototypes) Detailed plan of piloting and deploying the learner plan prototype Provide more details on project progress by monitoring and reporting KPIs e.g.
Detail how piloting activities inform development and contribute to refinements of the final beta version. Present in detail how the results from the piloting (including information on how many users, particularly NEETs and immigrants, have been involved in each iteration; key data collected in each country) informed the refinement of the consolidated Beta version. Detail how final outcomes of the project can be integrated in real-life environments. Present in detail any differences from real-life APIs to the mock-up data used, and how the CompLeap results can be integrated into existing services or frameworks, hence creating added value for service providers and for users. | Communication calendar and stakeholder management | D20 Running prototypes in cooperation with WP3 D24 Open source code for all components, including example code D26 Three prototypes (modules) D29 Pilot deployment of learner plan prototype D32 Report on pilot deployment of learner plan prototype | |
| 4 | Europass case study | Develop a detailed case study template to present the key dimensions explored and identified to interlink CompLeap and EUROPASS. Document and describe in detail:
| WP5 Eva Neffling EDUFI DUO | Willingness of Europass to cooperate? What's in it for them? | Workshop(s) organised succesfully in Compleap - Europass collaboration | Trying to contact William O'Keeffe again Action points after the July 4th meeting Europass meeting in Groningen organized July 4th Virtual meeting with Mika Launikari August 8th Europass Innovation WG meeting in Budapest in June 5th - virtual participation prepared Case examples from Estonia and Croatia Eva Neffling doing a desk study on this issue, no responses since August from the Commission. | Delivering the Europass case study 11/2019: Final draft of the desk study Final reporting (periodic report 12/2018-11/2019 + final report 12/2017-11/2019) | ||||
| 5 | Engaging communications of project results | Provide more details on project progress by monitoring and reporting KPIs e.g.
| DUO all partners contribute | where is the data stored? | Measurable data about the efficiency of communication
| Framework architecture video | Delivering D38 and D39 by 11/2019 Final reporting (periodic report 12/2018-11/2019 + final report 12/2017-11/2019) EDUFI creating two videos on prototype and piloting experiences Event preparations
Visual communications materials on Europass/CompLeap also in planning. Need/willingness for social media campaign? More effort is need to reach European audience. | D38 Presentations and publications | |||
| 6 | Effective management of project | CSC | Use of project resources - all resources mobilized for development? | Monthly financial reporting and monitoring in monthly project management committee meetings
| See previous PMC May 6th | Final reporting (periodic report 12/2018-11/2019 + final report 12/2017-11/2019) Action points for the whole project team based on the remote review in June 2019. |