You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 72 Next »

Deliverable 8 (living document in connection to Modified project plan). This road map document is a master page of the Compleap project and all relevant pages with further details and steps are linked here so that the page creates a holistic view of the project as a whole.


Main goals and project resultsDefinition of conceptsResponsible / Work package 

Identified risks 

(constantly monitored)

Key Performance Indicators (KPI) - measurements 


Current status - done so far

Green = Progressing as planned in the modified project plan and roadmap. 

Yellow = Delays or deviations. Guidance needed.

Red = Major challenges. Replanning needed.

Monthly status

PMC April 8th

PMC May 6th

PMC June 3rd

Foresight - to be done during the next month 

(same color coding)



DeploymentCommunication and dissemination of activitiesDeliverables across timelineEvaluation

Framework architecture

Main architecture aspects and system requirements


Ecosystem and modules user scenarios

T1.1 Framework architecture design



T1.2: Personal learner plan and user scenarios

User processes



WP2

  • EDUFI: Pauli Annica
  • CSC: Ari, Antti


  • EDUFI: Kiira






Deployment

WP4

  • Gradia: Tarja
  • CSC:
    Ari, Antti, Anu
  • EDUFI
    Pauli, Topias



International deployment: "To tailor the functionality of this framework so that it´s suitable across Europe" (Annex I p.3)

  • suitable, interested international partners missing
  • "in cooperation with international partners/networks" (Annex I p.4)

Is "improved recognition practices" included? (Annex I p.3)


"particularly addressing the needs of the citizen at risk of exclusion" - is this clear enough? (Annex I p.4)

Deployment progress monitoring

  • evaluation events progressing as planned
  • possible new partners joining deployment
  • how many of such partners willing to join the deployment in other countries
      

Minedu, EDUFI, associate partners and Ministry of Labour evaluation workshops held

Architecture design updated


Steering committee guidance needed in:

International deployment 

  • Netherlands situation?

Workshop in Cologne May 14th

  • framework evaluation with German stakeholders

Continuing evaluation sessions and pilot deployment with other stakeholders?

M17-M22

April-September

CompLeap Framework Architecture Deployment Plan

Communication calendar and stakeholder management

D18 Detailed description of the user scenarios with guidelines and advice for developers in WP3

D21 Feedback and specifications to user scenarios


D25 Technical documentation, including glossary, model and architecture


D27 Pilot deployment of the architecture 


D30 Report on pilot deployment of the architecture

Impact evaluation study 

Analytics prototype 


WP2: T1.3 Learning environments and analytics


WP3: 

  • Finnish national curriculum (ePerusteet) mapping  to ESCO
  • Recommendation system

Competence visualisation based on desk research (literature) and reference group generated ideas in workshops


Definition of data sources and Integration of in and outputs to the competence mapping



Educations recommendation desk research (literature)


WP2 TF-LEA

  • UOulu: Hanni, Egle, Antti
  • EDUFI: Annica  


Deployment

WP4

  • Gradia: Tarja
  • UOulu: Hanni, Egle, Antti K.
  • CSC:  Antti, Anu
  • EDUFI  Topias


  • Legal and other restrains to use actual user data


  • Preparation of user scenarios suitable to use outside Finland
  • "Various feedback loops such as analytics about learner profiles, graduate feedback or national competence requirements" (Annex I p.4)


Multi-sight development work can be challenging, and can slow down velocity. This needs to be mitigated through active communications and co-working in joint location when ever possible.

Development progress monitoring

  • development progressing as planned 



Deployment progress monitoring

  • detailed plan for deployment of analytics in additional document M18 (review feedback)
  • international partners interested and joining Compleap analytics work (measurable)

Analytics development - see in detailed PMC May 6th


Steering committee guidance needed in:

International deployment 

  • Netherlands situation?


Pilot deployment to be started in Finland

Discussions on the pilot deployment in Germany in Cologne workshop

National deployment

(Finland - all prototypes)


Detailed plan of the piloting and deployment of the analytics prototype

Communication calendar and stakeholder management 

D28 Pilot deployment of analytics prototype


D31 Report on pilot deployment of analytics


Learner plan prototype incl 3 modules

  • Initial functionalities incl. interface, content and associated services
  • Reference group review of functionalities
  • Finalized definition of functionalities incl. interface, content and associated services



Three prototypes defined as:

  • local service integrations - KOSKI, Diploma register (past)

  • competence profile (present)

  • suggestions - education opportunities (future)

 WP3

  • EDUFI: Annica, Marcus, Outi
  • Reaktor 


Deployment

WP4

  • Gradia: Tarja
  • EDUFI: Annica, Topias
  • UOulu:
  • CSC:  Antti, Anu


○    Increasing the number of backlog items at this point is likely not beneficial.


  • "Technological solution will be easily adaptable to different geographic locations and circumstances" - is it? (Annex I p.4)
  • "Several separate modules that are connected" (Annex I p.4), "Since each building block would be modular and autonomus"
  • "Iterative development process runs within partner organization in the Netherlands and results in a final product that is the project aim to implement at least in Finland and Netherlands" (Annex I p.16)


The timetable for development work is very challenging and anything arising from outside of the current prioritization risks current scope of delivery.


Strict timetable hinders ability to take on user feedback in development work. This needs to be documented well for future work.


Many stakeholders with sometimes contradictory demands.


Piloting and development planned in different organisations needs requires strong coordination of expectations on each side.

 

Development progress

  • development of modules progressing as planned 


Deployment progress 

  • detailed plan for deployment of learner plan in additional document M18 (review feedback)
  • amount of end-users
  • amount of other staff involved 
  • international partners interested and joining Compleap learner plan work (measurable)

Prototype development - see in detailed PMC May 6th




Steering committee guidance needed in:

International deployment 

  • Netherlands situation?
 

Developing and releasing the initial version of the Beta prototype (Beta part 1) by Month 18 and the full Beta version (Beta part 2) by Month 22);


Progression plan for the CompLeap prototype


Implemented by the 30th of May 2019

Competence Profile

  • The learner’s competencies are shown to the learner based on their KOSKI-data and data from eCurriculum
  • The learner can provide prior and future interests, which are shown as competencies

Recommended educational offer

  • based on competencies
  • based on interests

Recommendation system needs for analytics and algorithm availability

Finalised functionalities by 30th of August

The user piloting of the prototypes begins in May. Improvements to usability and tweaks based on feedback received in piloting are implemented by the 30th of August. Additionally, the possibility for the learner to include their Europass as well as Open Badges will be implemented in this stage.


Online Demos for the prototype development

will be held every two weeks from March 2019.


Pilot deployment to be started in Finland

Discussions on the pilot deployment in Germany in Cologne workshop

National deployment

(Finland - all prototypes)

Detailed plan of piloting and deploying the learner plan prototype

Communication calendar and stakeholder management


D20 Running prototypes in cooperation with WP3


D24 Open source code for all components, including example code

D26 Three prototypes (modules)

D29 Pilot deployment of learner plan prototype

D32 Report on pilot deployment of learner plan prototype



Case Study with Europass

WP5

DUO / EDUFI

Willingness of Europass to cooperate? What's in it for them? Workshop(s) organised succesfully in Compleap - Europass collaboration 

Europass Innovation WG meeting in Budapest in June - virtual participation?

Europass meeting in Groningen - last week of June or first week of July - preparations going on 

Eva Nefling doing a desk study on this issue.

Workshop dates confirmed 

D38 Presentations and publications


D39 Targeted workshops and seminars


Engaging communications of project results

DUO

all contribution

where is the data stored?

Measurable data about the efficiency of communication

  • events
  • publications
  • social media
  • website 

Communication calendar

Event calendar







Effective management of project


CSC  Deliverable 14: Risk management plan - re-submitted by March 14th 

D14 should be resubmitted and include a contingency plan to mitigate the delays in WP3 and reach the stated project objectives.

Monthly financial reporting and monitoring in monthly project management committee meetings





D9 Project management and steering group meetings M1-M24











  • No labels